posted by birdchick at 7:29 AM
I propose a new name for this obvious sub-speices of the IBWO.This new sub-species is "Campephilus nonphotographibus"
That name makes no grammatical sense.
"That name makes no grammatical sense."It made sense to me... I understood it, and if you can't comprehend what he's trying to say, then I'm sorry for you.
Ooops, I made a mistake. I should be forgiven since I'm not an ornithologist. :)))If it's a subspecies it has to be"Campephilus principalis nonphotographibus"
Or maybe "Campephilus invisibilianus?"
Post a Comment
<< Home
To show the world that you can be a birder without being a geek.
View my complete profile
My digiscoping setup National Camera Exchange San Diego Birding Festival March 5-8, 2009 You can also order City Birds, Country Birds from your local bookstore, or online at Barnes & Noble and Amazon! Birdchick T-Shirts!
Watch for Birdchick's"Birding Gear Tips" inWildBird Magazine
5 Comments:
I propose a new name for this obvious sub-speices of the IBWO.
This new sub-species is
"Campephilus nonphotographibus"
That name makes no grammatical sense.
"That name makes no grammatical sense."
It made sense to me... I understood it, and if you can't comprehend what he's trying to say, then I'm sorry for you.
Ooops, I made a mistake. I should be forgiven since I'm not an ornithologist. :)))
If it's a subspecies it has to be
"Campephilus principalis nonphotographibus"
Or maybe "Campephilus invisibilianus?"
Post a Comment
<< Home